F. M. Dostoevsky and André Gide

F. M. Dostoevsky and André Gide
Author :
Publisher :
Total Pages : 634
Release :
ISBN-10 : WISC:89102120409
ISBN-13 :
Rating : 4/5 ( Downloads)
GET BOOK
Book Synopsis F. M. Dostoevsky and André Gide by : Tatiana Vacquier

Download or read book F. M. Dostoevsky and André Gide written by Tatiana Vacquier and published by . This book was released on 1927 with total page 634 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt:


F. M. Dostoevsky and André Gide Related Books

F. M. Dostoevsky and André Gide
Language: en
Pages: 634

F. M. Dostoevsky and André Gide

Authors: Tatiana Vacquier
Categories:
Type: BOOK - Published: 1927 - Publisher:

GET EBOOK

Dostoevsky
Language: en
Pages: 200

Dostoevsky

Authors: André Gide
Categories: Literary Criticism
Type: BOOK - Published: 1979 - Publisher: Praeger

GET EBOOK

This was the first publication in English in its entirety of Gide's critical study of the Russian genius. Albert J. Guerard notes in his introduction, [This boo
F. M. Dostoevsky
Language: en
Pages: 284

F. M. Dostoevsky

Authors: Miriam T. Šajkovic
Categories: Education
Type: BOOK - Published: 2016-11-11 - Publisher: University of Pennsylvania Press

GET EBOOK

"Dostoevsky is the unrivaled and perspicacious seer of the human mind and heart; he emerges as a great friend and teacher of humanity. He has dearly read the si
Dostoevsky’s Religion
Language: en
Pages: 238

Dostoevsky’s Religion

Authors: Steven Cassedy
Categories: Literary Criticism
Type: BOOK - Published: 2005-05-02 - Publisher: Stanford University Press

GET EBOOK

Any reader of Dostoevsky is immediately struck by the importance of religion within the world of his fiction. That said, it is very difficult to locate a cohere
Dostoevsky's Conception of Man
Language: en
Pages: 298

Dostoevsky's Conception of Man

Authors: Peter McGuire Wolf
Categories: Literary Criticism
Type: BOOK - Published: 1997-10 - Publisher: Universal-Publishers

GET EBOOK

Dostoevsky's novels have contributed to a conception of man that reverberates in the conclusions of prominent twentieth-century philosophical anthropologists. M