Constitutional Predicament

Constitutional Predicament
Author :
Publisher : McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP
Total Pages : 306
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9780773564756
ISBN-13 : 0773564756
Rating : 4/5 (756 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Constitutional Predicament by : Curtis Cook

Download or read book Constitutional Predicament written by Curtis Cook and published by McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP. This book was released on 1994-05-16 with total page 306 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Canada's fifth effort at "mega-constitutional politics" was a period of popular discussion and leadership negotiation, that ran from the defeat in 1990 of the Meech Lake Accord through the Charlottetown Accord and the referendum of 26 October 1992. Constitutional Predicament explores the referendum in relation to the democratic process; nationalism (Canadian, Aboriginal, Québécois) and pluralism; principles of constitutionalism, constitution-making, and popular participation in constitution-making; the role of the Charter and Supreme Court; future constitutional efforts; and worldwide trends. The contributors agree that Canadian voters rejected the Charlottetown proposals because they disapproved of both their content and the procedure by which they were drawn up. They conclude that, while Quebec remains the chief problem for the Canadian constitution, Quebec was not the sole constitutional issue or the sole issue which determined how Canadians voted. The constitutional process did help make it apparent that Canada is multinational and that each of the three major nations has valid claims on the political system. The contributors offer contrasting views on how the Charlottetown Accord came to read as it does, why negotiators at Charlottetown so misjudged public opinion, and the prognosis for further constitution-making. Readers may also see the referendum vote as a preview of the vote in the general election of October 1993, which unseated the Tories one year later, almost to the day. Taken together with the accompanying provocative commentaries, the essays will be of specific interest to students of Canadian politics and constitutional affairs. The complete text of the Charlottetown Accord is included in an appendix. The contributors and commentators are Janet Ajzenstat, Alan C. Cairns, Curtis Cook, Barry Cooper, Peter Emberley, David Hendrickson, Robert J. Jackson, Juan Lindau, F.L. Morton, Alain Noël, and James Tully.


Constitutional Predicament Related Books

Constitutional Predicament
Language: en
Pages: 306
Authors: Curtis Cook
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 1994-05-16 - Publisher: McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP

GET EBOOK

Canada's fifth effort at "mega-constitutional politics" was a period of popular discussion and leadership negotiation, that ran from the defeat in 1990 of the M
Putin's Predicament
Language: en
Pages: 231
Authors: Bo Petersson
Categories: Political Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-09-09 - Publisher: BoD – Books on Demand

GET EBOOK

Using the Russian president’s major public addresses as the main source, Bo Petersson analyzes the legitimization strategies employed during Vladimir Putin’
The Policy State
Language: en
Pages: 273
Authors: Karen Orren
Categories: History
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-10-23 - Publisher: Harvard University Press

GET EBOOK

The steady accretion of public policies over the decades has fundamentally changed how America is governed. The formulation and delivery of policy have emerged
The Constitutional Systems of the Independent Central Asian States
Language: en
Pages: 332
Authors: Scott Newton
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-02-23 - Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing

GET EBOOK

This book undertakes the first comparative constitutional analysis of the Kyrgyz Republic and Republics of Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan i
The Supreme Court and the Decline of Constitutional Aspiration
Language: en
Pages: 196
Authors: Gary J. Jacobsohn
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 1986 - Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield

GET EBOOK

'An excellent commentary on and an insightful contribution to the current debate on constitutional interpretation.'-Walter F. Murphy, Princeton University