Chinese Contract Law

Chinese Contract Law
Author :
Publisher : Cambridge University Press
Total Pages : 545
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9781107176324
ISBN-13 : 1107176328
Rating : 4/5 (328 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Chinese Contract Law by : Larry A. DiMatteo

Download or read book Chinese Contract Law written by Larry A. DiMatteo and published by Cambridge University Press. This book was released on 2017-10-26 with total page 545 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: A unique comparative analysis of Chinese contract law accessible to lawyers from civil, common, and mixed law jurisdictions.


Chinese Contract Law Related Books

Chinese Contract Law
Language: en
Pages: 545
Authors: Larry A. DiMatteo
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2017-10-26 - Publisher: Cambridge University Press

GET EBOOK

A unique comparative analysis of Chinese contract law accessible to lawyers from civil, common, and mixed law jurisdictions.
Contract Law in China
Language: en
Pages: 636
Authors: Bing Ling
Categories: Contracts
Type: BOOK - Published: 2002 - Publisher:

GET EBOOK

Chinese Contract Law - Theory & Practice, Second Edition
Language: en
Pages: 495
Authors: Mo Zhang
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019-12-16 - Publisher: BRILL

GET EBOOK

Chinese Contract Law (2nd Ed) offers an in-depth analysis of the contract making process, performance and remedies in the legal framework established under the
Chinese Contract Law
Language: en
Pages: 389
Authors: Mo Zhang
Categories: Law
Type: BOOK - Published: 2006 - Publisher: BRILL

GET EBOOK

This volume presents a well-analyzed inside view of Chinese contract law in theory and practice, which will be of interest to both academic researchers and prac
The Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China
Language: en
Pages: 477
Authors: Durham Law School
Categories: Business & Economics
Type: BOOK - Published: 2021-10-18 - Publisher: BRILL

GET EBOOK

This contribution provides the important and timely bilingual version of the Chinese Civil Code and the Supreme People’s Court’s Judicial Interpretation of