Contingency and Natural Order in Early Modern Science

Contingency and Natural Order in Early Modern Science
Author :
Publisher : Springer
Total Pages : 343
Release :
ISBN-10 : 9783319673783
ISBN-13 : 3319673785
Rating : 4/5 (785 Downloads)

Book Synopsis Contingency and Natural Order in Early Modern Science by : Pietro Daniel Omodeo

Download or read book Contingency and Natural Order in Early Modern Science written by Pietro Daniel Omodeo and published by Springer. This book was released on 2019-09-09 with total page 343 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: This volume considers contingency as a historical category resulting from the combination of various intellectual elements – epistemological, philosophical, material, as well as theological and, broadly speaking, intellectual. With contributions ranging from fields as diverse as the histories of physics, astronomy, astrology, medicine, mechanics, physiology, and natural philosophy, it explores the transformation of the notion of contingency across the late-medieval, Renaissance, and the early modern period. Underpinned by a necessitated vision of nature, seventeenth century mechanism widely identified apparent natural irregularities with the epistemological limits of a certain explanatory framework. However, this picture was preceded by, and in fact emerged from, a widespread characterization of contingency as an ontological trait of nature, typical of late-Scholastic and Renaissance science. On these bases, this volume shows how epistemological categories, which are preconditions of knowledge as “historically-situated a priori” and, seemingly, self-evident, are ultimately rooted in time. Contingency is intrinsic to scientific practice. Whether observing the behaviour of a photon, diagnosing a patient, or calculating the orbit of a distant planet, scientists face the unavoidable challenge of dealing with data that differ from their models and expectations. However, epistemological categories are not fixed in time. Indeed, there is something fundamentally different in the way an Aristotelian natural philosopher defined a wonder or a “monstrous” birth as “contingent”, a modern scientist defines the unexpected result of an experiment, and a quantum physicist the behavior of a photon. Although to each inquirer these instances appeared self-evidently contingent, each also employs the concept differently.


Contingency and Natural Order in Early Modern Science Related Books

Contingency and Natural Order in Early Modern Science
Language: en
Pages: 343
Authors: Pietro Daniel Omodeo
Categories: Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019-09-09 - Publisher: Springer

GET EBOOK

This volume considers contingency as a historical category resulting from the combination of various intellectual elements – epistemological, philosophical, m
Contingency and Natural Order in Early Modern Science
Language: en
Pages: 341
Authors:
Categories: Electronic books
Type: BOOK - Published: 2019 - Publisher:

GET EBOOK

This volume considers contingency as a historical category resulting from the combination of various intellectual elements - epistemological, philosophical, mat
Subverting Aristotle
Language: en
Pages: 271
Authors: Craig Martin
Categories: Science
Type: BOOK - Published: 2014-05-15 - Publisher: JHU Press

GET EBOOK

How new thinking about history, evidence, and scientific authority depended on undermining the authority of Aristotelianism. “The belief that Aristotle’s ph
Defending Descartes in Brandenburg-Prussia
Language: en
Pages: 236
Authors: Pietro Daniel Omodeo
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2022-08-26 - Publisher: Springer Nature

GET EBOOK

This volume is a study of the many dimensions of the early reception of Cartesianism in German-speaking Europe during the seventeenth century based on the case
Natural Final Causality and Scholastic Thought
Language: en
Pages: 269
Authors: Corey Barnes
Categories: Religion
Type: BOOK - Published: 2024-08-13 - Publisher: Taylor & Francis

GET EBOOK

This book examines scholastic conceptions of final causality through the methods and concerns of historical theology. It argues the history of final causality i